Home Writings press statements Duterte has gone into a waiver of Philippine sovereign rights but China demands explicit surrender of these rights

Duterte has gone into a waiver of Philippine sovereign rights but China demands explicit surrender of these rights

Duterte has gone into a waiver of Philippine sovereign rights but China demands explicit surrender of these rights
MAKATI, PHILIPPINES - 2015/06/12: Protesters holding posters against China's claim on the West Philippine Sea. Hundreds of people marched to the Chinese Consulate in Buendia, Makati during the 117th celebration of Philippine Independence to air their concern against China's stand on the West Philippine Sea, also known as the South China Sea. China has constructed several military bases on artificial islands destroying the local ecosystem of the reefs on the disputed islands. (Photo by J Gerard Seguia/Pacific Press/LightRocket via Getty Images)

Statement by Jose Maria Sison
NDFP Chief Political Consultant
December 8, 2018

Justice Carpio is overoptimistic and wrong that China will accept a mere service contract to give up China’s baseless claims over the West Philippine Sea and recognize the sovereign rights of the Philippines in accordance with the UNCLOS and the legal victory of the Philippines before the Permanent Court of Arbitration in July, 2016.

Former Solicitor General Hilbay is correct that the Duterte regime has already treasonously and stupidly made a waiver of Philippine sovereign rights by falling silent on these and putting these at par with the false claims of China in the MOU on the joint China-Philippine joint exploration and development of the oil and gas resources under the West Philippines Sea.

But China itself is not yet satisfied with the mere waiver by implication of the Duterte regime’s falling silent on the Philippines’ sovereign rights and putting these at par with the false claims of China. China wants an explicit and categorical surrender of Philippine sovereign rights to China.

Thus, China is using as leverage Duterte’s own inane obsession with getting high interest loans worth USD 9 to 24 billion for some 29 overpriced infrastructure projects. After more than two years since Duterte’s trip to China in October 2016, China has started no more than two infrastructure projects worth far less than USD 1 billion.

Even at this stage, Duterte cannot be sure that he can benefit from his false and stupid calculation that the burdensome and exploitative Chinese loans will buoy up his regime and the Philippine economy.

Even if the Chinese pledge of USD 9 to 24 billion loans were realized, these would further deteriorate the Philippine economy in conjunction with the accumulated loans from the traditional lenders whose interest rates are now rising rapidly in line with the US-initiated policy of quantitative tightening.

The Duterte regime is already moving into the second half of its 6-year term. These are lameduck years for Duterte amid the rising mass movement for his ouster, the bankruptcy of the reactionary government, stinking corruption of the bureaucracy and the military and a growing split between pro-US and pro-Duterte factions within the AFP and PNP.

The isolation and detestation of Duterte by the broad masses of the people are the result of the tyranny and brutality of the regime, rampant corruption, the rising unemployment and dwindling incomes, the mounting tax burden and soaring prices of basic goods and services, the treasonous sell-out to China and other major causes.


PHL-China oil deal may resolve maritime dispute —Carpio
Published December 7, 2018 8:40pm

Manila and Beijing’s memorandum of understanding (MOU) on oil and gas development may lead to a “win-win formula” that could resolve the South China Sea dispute, Supreme Court Justice Antonio Carpio said Friday.

The senior justice believes that a service contract-type agreement, similar to the Malampaya gas project off Palawan, may usher in a period where China is satisfied with splitting income instead of claiming the Philippines’ rights to the vital sea lane.

Being a service contractor requires compliance to Philippine laws and an admission that the gas in the area belongs to the country, Carpio said in an interview with political analyst Richard Heydarian.

“That would be the solution because China will get maybe half of the income but they don’t get the sovereign rights. I envision that as the final settlement,” the magistrate said.

A vocal advocate of the Philippines’ maritime claims, Carpio said he supports the MOU signed by President Rodrigo Duterte and Chinese President Xi Jinping during the latter’s state visit.

This is because he believes that such a deal, which “envisions a service contract,” may pave the way for China to enter what he calls the “third phase” of the dispute: agreeing to getting half of the income in an oil and gas development project and no longer claiming sovereign rights in the exclusive economic zone (EEZ) of other claimant states.

The first phase was when China “claimed everything,” and the second was after the landmark arbitral ruling that invalidated the Asian giant’s nine-dash line, resulting in Beijing agreeing to “meet us halfway,” he said.

In a forum in Makati earlier in the day, Carpio said that whether or not a sea dispute settlement nears depends on the result of negotiations in the working committee between the China National Offshore Corporation (CNOOC) and the Philippine service contractor.

He did not rule out the possibility that the talks will see China going back to a “joint exploration and exploitation” — which he considers an unconstitutional route.

“But there is also the possibility that China will realize that service contract may be the only win-win formula to resolve the maritime dispute in the entire South China Sea, and will thus cooperate with the Philippines through Philippine service contractors,” he said.

According to Carpio, the MOU that Duterte and Xi signed was the draft prepared by the Philippine Department of Foreign Affairs — not its Chinese counterpart, which wanted a joint exploration and exploitation that would have violated the Constitution.

The DFA then drafted a “vastly different” document that proposed a cooperation on oil and gas through service contractors, which he said are valid under the Constitution.

Carpio acknowledged that China may interpret the MOU differently, but said “this is the opportunity to discuss service contract with CNOOC.”

“Anyway, we are well protected and we have nothing to lose under the MOU. Whether we are in the third phase or still stuck in the second phase, we will know for sure within 12 months,” he said in the forum, referring to the deadline for the working group to hammer out a deal. —LDF, GMA News


Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.